Re: [RFC] Restrict size of page_cgroup->flags

[Daisuke Nishimura]

On Thu, 7 Oct 2010 08:44:59 +0530
Balbir Singh <balbir@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> * nishimura@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx <nishimura@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> [2010-10-07 09:54:58]:
> 
> > On Wed, 6 Oct 2010 19:53:14 +0530
> > Balbir Singh <balbir@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > 
> > > I propose restricting page_cgroup.flags to 16 bits. The patch for the
> > > same is below. Comments?
> > > 
> > > 
> > > Restrict the bits usage in page_cgroup.flags
> > > 
> > > From: Balbir Singh <balbir@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > 
> > > Restricting the flags helps control growth of the flags unbound.
> > > Restriciting it to 16 bits gives us the possibility of merging
> > > cgroup id with flags (atomicity permitting) and saving a whole
> > > long word in page_cgroup
> > > 
> > I agree that reducing the size of page_cgroup would be good and important.
> > But, wouldn't it be better to remove ->page, if possible ?
> >
> 
> Without the page pointer, how do we go from pc to page for reclaim? 
> 
We store page_cgroups in arrays now, so I suppose we can implement pc_to_pfn()
using the similar calculation as page_to_pfn() does.
IIRC, KAMEZAWA-san talked about it in another thread.

Thanks,
Daisuke Nishimura.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/