Re: [PATCH 00/10] memcg: per cgroup dirty page accounting

From: Balbir Singh
Date: Tue Oct 05 2010 - 23:23:25 EST


* Greg Thelen <gthelen@xxxxxxxxxx> [2010-10-03 23:57:55]:

> This patch set provides the ability for each cgroup to have independent dirty
> page limits.
>
> Limiting dirty memory is like fixing the max amount of dirty (hard to reclaim)
> page cache used by a cgroup. So, in case of multiple cgroup writers, they will
> not be able to consume more than their designated share of dirty pages and will
> be forced to perform write-out if they cross that limit.
>
> These patches were developed and tested on mmotm 2010-09-28-16-13. The patches
> are based on a series proposed by Andrea Righi in Mar 2010.
>
> Overview:
> - Add page_cgroup flags to record when pages are dirty, in writeback, or nfs
> unstable.
> - Extend mem_cgroup to record the total number of pages in each of the
> interesting dirty states (dirty, writeback, unstable_nfs).
> - Add dirty parameters similar to the system-wide /proc/sys/vm/dirty_*
> limits to mem_cgroup. The mem_cgroup dirty parameters are accessible
> via cgroupfs control files.
> - Consider both system and per-memcg dirty limits in page writeback when
> deciding to queue background writeback or block for foreground writeback.
>
> Known shortcomings:
> - When a cgroup dirty limit is exceeded, then bdi writeback is employed to
> writeback dirty inodes. Bdi writeback considers inodes from any cgroup, not
> just inodes contributing dirty pages to the cgroup exceeding its limit.
>
> Performance measurements:
> - kernel builds are unaffected unless run with a small dirty limit.
> - all data collected with CONFIG_CGROUP_MEM_RES_CTLR=y.
> - dd has three data points (in secs) for three data sizes (100M, 200M, and 1G).
> As expected, dd slows when it exceed its cgroup dirty limit.
>
> kernel_build dd
> mmotm 2:37 0.18, 0.38, 1.65
> root_memcg
>
> mmotm 2:37 0.18, 0.35, 1.66
> non-root_memcg
>
> mmotm+patches 2:37 0.18, 0.35, 1.68
> root_memcg
>
> mmotm+patches 2:37 0.19, 0.35, 1.69
> non-root_memcg
>
> mmotm+patches 2:37 0.19, 2.34, 22.82
> non-root_memcg
> 150 MiB memcg dirty limit
>
> mmotm+patches 3:58 1.71, 3.38, 17.33
> non-root_memcg
> 1 MiB memcg dirty limit
>

Greg, could you please try the parallel page fault test. Could you
look at commit 0c3e73e84fe3f64cf1c2e8bb4e91e8901cbcdc38 and
569b846df54ffb2827b83ce3244c5f032394cba4 for examples.

--
Three Cheers,
Balbir
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/