Re: [RFC v2 00/21] TCM Core and TCM_Loop patches for v2.6.37

[FUJITA Tomonori]

On Wed, 22 Sep 2010 15:48:22 -0700
"Nicholas A. Bellinger" <nab@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

>  drivers/Kconfig                                |    2 +
>  drivers/Makefile                               |    1 +
>  drivers/target/Kbuild                          |   30 +
>  drivers/target/Kconfig                         |   36 +

Why do we need a new place for the target stuff? This could be used
for non scsi protocl?

We had the similar discussion when I put stgt to mainline but we
concluded that under drivers/scsi is the best place.

I don't like to put ibmvscsi driver under something like
drivers/target/tcm_ibmvscsit because ibmvscsi needs to include some
files under drivers/scsi/ibmvscsi/. It's more reasonable to put the
driver there.

Can we change the name, TCM (Target Core Mod), to something more
informative? I think that "Core Mod" is really pointless.

This will be the mainline scsi target feature so why can't we name
the files and modules in more appropriate way?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/