linux-next: manual merge of the lost-spurious-irq tree with the tiptree

[Stephen Rothwell]

Hi Tejun,

Today's linux-next merge of the lost-spurious-irq tree got a conflict in
kernel/irq/internals.h between commits
a77c4635915021c646cc017f22239e66d1aab4d5 ("genirq: Add new functions to
dummy chips") and bd151412263a67b5321e9dd1d5b4bf6d96fdebf3 ("genirq:
Provide config option to disable deprecated code") from the tip tree and
commits 32b5d378f49485f3ae172eb0ac2bfc4ebbbdb060 ("irq: cleanup
irqfixup") and 80f97e2b33c3e66c11b10abd2890506a3abeb320 ("irq: make
spurious poll timer per desc") from the lost-spurious-irq tree.

Just context changes.  I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fixes
as necessary.
-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell                    sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

diff --cc kernel/irq/internals.h
index b905f0a,1b24309..0000000
--- a/kernel/irq/internals.h
+++ b/kernel/irq/internals.h
@@@ -2,10 -2,6 +2,8 @@@
   * IRQ subsystem internal functions and variables:
   */
  
- extern int noirqdebug;
- 
 +#define irq_data_to_desc(data)	container_of(data, struct irq_desc, irq_data)
 +
  /* Set default functions for irq_chip structures: */
  extern void irq_chip_set_defaults(struct irq_chip *chip);
  
@@@ -42,27 -38,23 +40,33 @@@ extern int irq_select_affinity_usr(unsi
  
  extern void irq_set_thread_affinity(struct irq_desc *desc);
  
 +#ifndef CONFIG_GENERIC_HARDIRQS_NO_DEPRECATED
 +static inline void irq_end(unsigned int irq, struct irq_desc *desc)
 +{
 +	if (desc->irq_data.chip && desc->irq_data.chip->end)
 +		desc->irq_data.chip->end(irq);
 +}
 +#else
 +static inline void irq_end(unsigned int irq, struct irq_desc *desc) { }
 +#endif
 +
+ extern void poll_irq(unsigned long arg);
+ extern void irq_poll_action_added(struct irq_desc *desc,
+ 				  struct irqaction *action);
+ extern void irq_poll_action_removed(struct irq_desc *desc,
+ 				    struct irqaction *action);
+ 
  /* Inline functions for support of irq chips on slow busses */
 -static inline void chip_bus_lock(unsigned int irq, struct irq_desc *desc)
 +static inline void chip_bus_lock(struct irq_desc *desc)
  {
 -	if (unlikely(desc->chip->bus_lock))
 -		desc->chip->bus_lock(irq);
 +	if (unlikely(desc->irq_data.chip->irq_bus_lock))
 +		desc->irq_data.chip->irq_bus_lock(&desc->irq_data);
  }
  
 -static inline void chip_bus_sync_unlock(unsigned int irq, struct irq_desc *desc)
 +static inline void chip_bus_sync_unlock(struct irq_desc *desc)
  {
 -	if (unlikely(desc->chip->bus_sync_unlock))
 -		desc->chip->bus_sync_unlock(irq);
 +	if (unlikely(desc->irq_data.chip->irq_bus_sync_unlock))
 +		desc->irq_data.chip->irq_bus_sync_unlock(&desc->irq_data);
  }
  
  /*
@@@ -76,11 -68,11 +80,11 @@@
  static inline void print_irq_desc(unsigned int irq, struct irq_desc *desc)
  {
  	printk("irq %d, desc: %p, depth: %d, count: %d, unhandled: %d\n",
- 		irq, desc, desc->depth, desc->irq_count, desc->irqs_unhandled);
+ 		irq, desc, desc->depth, desc->spr.nr_samples, desc->spr.nr_bad);
  	printk("->handle_irq():  %p, ", desc->handle_irq);
  	print_symbol("%s\n", (unsigned long)desc->handle_irq);
 -	printk("->chip(): %p, ", desc->chip);
 -	print_symbol("%s\n", (unsigned long)desc->chip);
 +	printk("->irq_data.chip(): %p, ", desc->irq_data.chip);
 +	print_symbol("%s\n", (unsigned long)desc->irq_data.chip);
  	printk("->action(): %p\n", desc->action);
  	if (desc->action) {
  		printk("->action->handler(): %p, ", desc->action->handler);
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/