Re: [PATCH] AF_UNIX: Implement SO_TIMESTAMP and SO_TIMETAMPNS onUnix sockets

[Eric Dumazet]

Le lundi 04 octobre 2010 Ã 19:01 +0100, Alban Crequy a Ãcrit :
> Userspace applications can already request to receive timestamps with:
> setsockopt(sockfd, SOL_SOCKET, SO_TIMESTAMP, ...)
> 
> Although setsockopt() returns zero (success), timestamps are not added to the
> ancillary data. This patch fixes that on SOCK_DGRAM and SOCK_SEQPACKET Unix
> sockets.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Alban Crequy <alban.crequy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  net/unix/af_unix.c |    3 +++
>  1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/net/unix/af_unix.c b/net/unix/af_unix.c
> index 617bea4..bca0c1e 100644
> --- a/net/unix/af_unix.c
> +++ b/net/unix/af_unix.c
> @@ -1697,6 +1697,9 @@ static int unix_dgram_recvmsg(struct kiocb *iocb, struct socket *sock,
>  	if (err)
>  		goto out_free;
>  
> +	if (sock_flag(sk, SOCK_RCVTSTAMP))
> +		__sock_recv_timestamp(msg, sk, skb);
> +
>  	if (!siocb->scm) {
>  		siocb->scm = &tmp_scm;
>  		memset(&tmp_scm, 0, sizeof(tmp_scm));

Hmm, but how is set skb->tstamp ?

I think its zero at this point, so __sock_recv_timestamp() use current
time, not time of send().

gettimeofday() might be better/cheaper :)



--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/