Re: [Bug #17361] Watchdog detected hard LOCKUP in jbd2_journal_get_write_access

[Vegard Nossum]

On 2 October 2010 18:52, Ted Ts'o <tytso@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 26, 2010 at 10:04:13PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>>
>> Bug-Entry   : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17361
>> Subject        : Watchdog detected hard LOCKUP in jbd2_journal_get_write_access
>> Submitter   : Christian Casteyde <casteyde.christian@xxxxxxx>
>> Date     Â: 2010-08-29 19:59 (29 days old)
>
> See my latest comment here:
>
> Â Âhttps://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17361#c14
>
> This subject line is highly misleading, since after -rc4, the stack
> traces are in places all over the kernel, in other places other than
> ext4/jbd2. ÂSo I fear no one is looking at this bug report given the
> highly misleading subject line.
>
> It looks like you have spinlock debugging, and yet there wan't any
> spinlocks listed on the initial ext4 might_sleep() warning. ÂSo
> something looks highly confused.
>
> The fact that you closed other bugs as duplicates of this one that
> relate to kmemcheck makes me wonder if this is really a kmemcheck bug.
> (If so, the subject line here is doubly, doubly misleading.)
>
> Do you see any symptoms if you turn off kmemcheck? ÂAre you sure this
> isn't just only a kmemcheck bug?

I just had a quick glance at the report, and here's my gut feeling: I
see perf symbols in the stack trace. I don't think kmemcheck and perf
play nicely together (for example if perf uses NMIs to write data to
its buffers, it could get a page fault inside the NMI handler, which
is not so nice, I think).

Isn't this exactly what Frederic Weisbecker tried to detect and warn
about in a patch that I saw recently?

Please do as Ted suggested and try to turn kmemcheck off.


Vegard
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/