Re: [PATCH RESEND v3 09/24] ptrace: cleanup arch_ptrace() on frv

From: Namhyung Kim
Date: Sat Oct 02 2010 - 01:02:53 EST


2010-10-02 (í), 12:57 +0900, Namhyung Kim:
> 2010-10-02 (í), 03:18 +0000, Daniel K.:
> > Namhyung Kim wrote:
> > > case PTRACE_POKEUSR: /* write the word at location addr in the USER area */
> > > ret = -EIO;
> > - if ((addr & 3) || addr < 0)
> > + if (addr & 3)
> > break;
> >
> > > - ret = 0;
> > > - switch (addr >> 2) {
> > > + switch (regno) {
> > > case 0 ... PT__END - 1:
> > > - ret = put_reg(child, addr >> 2, data);
> > > - break;
> > > -
> > > - default:
> > > - ret = -EIO;
> > > + ret = put_reg(child, regno, data);
> > > break;
> > > }
> > > break;
> >
> > With this, you remove the default case, and no longer return -EIO in the
> > cases of PT__END + n, as in the PTRACE_PEEKUSR section above.
> >
> > This is a change of behaviour as far as I can tell, and not just a cleanup.
> >
> >
> > Daniel K.
>
> My bad. It should be my mistake. Will resend the fix soon.
> Thanks.
>
>

My mistake, again. I was bit confused.

It would not be a change of behaviour. Because 'ret' was initialized
with -EIO and only changed in the switch case. So assignment before
switch can be removed and then will return -EIO in default case.

Thanks.


--
Regards,
Namhyung Kim


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/