max_user_watches overflows on 16TB system.

From: Robin Holt
Date: Fri Oct 01 2010 - 16:01:50 EST



Following a boot of a 16TB system, we noticed that the max_user_watches
sysctl was negative. Is there any downside to converting that to a
static long and handling the fallout from the change? I believe that
fallout includes changing the definition of epoll_watches over to an
atomic_long_t as well.

Alternatively should we just limit max_user_watches to INT_MAX?

Thanks,
Robin Holt
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/