Re: [PATCH] x86: tidy e820 output

From: David Rientjes
Date: Wed Sep 22 2010 - 19:27:28 EST


On Wed, 22 Sep 2010, H. Peter Anvin wrote:

> > I'm referring to using [start, start + addr - 1] in the output, like
> > /sys/firmware/memmap does, as opposed to [start, start + addr]. Is it not
> > valuable to include the actual e820 map in some way, especially when you
> > have your own BIOS? We've always used this output since it isn't
> > available later.
>
> "The actual e820 map" contains (start, length, type) -- the end bracket
> is not part of it at all. Either way, /sys/firmware/memmap does provide
> the memory map as provided by the firmware through whatever means.
>

Ok, I agree that fixing the off-by-1 problem that's been there for ages is
better and worth modifying our scripts when they break. Thanks!
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/