[PATCH] tcm: Allow MappedLUNs with non existent struct se_lun

From: Nicholas A. Bellinger
Date: Wed Sep 22 2010 - 06:29:36 EST


From: Nicholas Bellinger <nab@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Greetings Joel and Co,

This patch updates the TCM fabric independent MappedLUN ConfigFS handler in
target_core_fabric_configfs.c:target_fabric_mappedlun_unlink() and
associated TCM Core device + tpg code to allow a MappedLUN group at
struct se_lun_acl->se_lun_group to function with a non-existent struct se_lun
that has been removed with an explict target_core_fabric_configfs.c:
target_fabric_port_unlink() to the parent struct config_group while any number
of N MappedLUN struct config_group's are still outstanding in the TCM fabric
ConfigFS layout.

This patch has been tested with a manual unlink(2) of $FABRIC/lun/lun_0/$PORT_SYMLINK
and $FABRIC/acl/$NODE_ACL/lun_0/lunacl_link and /etc/init.d/target stop with
multiple outstanding MappedLUN w/o a valid TPG struct se_lun symlink.

Many thanks to Joel Becker for helping to resolve this issue without
the original ->check_link() patch to fs/configfs/symlink.c:configfs_unlink()..!

Signed-off-by: Nicholas A. Bellinger <nab@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/target/target_core_device.c | 4 ++++
drivers/target/target_core_fabric_configfs.c | 16 ++++++++++++----
drivers/target/target_core_tpg.c | 8 --------
3 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/target/target_core_device.c b/drivers/target/target_core_device.c
index f52fff8..6fe4408 100644
--- a/drivers/target/target_core_device.c
+++ b/drivers/target/target_core_device.c
@@ -470,6 +470,10 @@ int core_update_device_list_for_node(
* core_alua_do_transition_tg_pt() depends on these being present.
*/
if (!(enable)) {
+ if (!(deve->se_lun_acl)) {
+ dump_stack();
+ return 0;
+ }
spin_lock_bh(&port->sep_alua_lock);
list_del(&deve->alua_port_list);
spin_unlock_bh(&port->sep_alua_lock);
diff --git a/drivers/target/target_core_fabric_configfs.c b/drivers/target/target_core_fabric_configfs.c
index 58da51a..f433120 100644
--- a/drivers/target/target_core_fabric_configfs.c
+++ b/drivers/target/target_core_fabric_configfs.c
@@ -137,11 +137,20 @@ static int target_fabric_mappedlun_unlink(
struct config_item *lun_acl_ci,
struct config_item *lun_ci)
{
- struct se_lun *lun = container_of(to_config_group(lun_ci),
- struct se_lun, lun_group);
+ struct se_lun *lun;
struct se_lun_acl *lacl = container_of(to_config_group(lun_acl_ci),
struct se_lun_acl, se_lun_group);
- struct se_portal_group *se_tpg = lun->lun_sep->sep_tpg;
+ struct se_node_acl *nacl = lacl->se_lun_nacl;
+ struct se_dev_entry *deve = &nacl->device_list[lacl->mapped_lun];
+ struct se_portal_group *se_tpg;
+ /*
+ * Determine if the underlying MappedLUN has already been released..
+ */
+ if (!(deve->se_lun))
+ return 0;
+
+ lun = container_of(to_config_group(lun_ci), struct se_lun, lun_group);
+ se_tpg = lun->lun_sep->sep_tpg;

core_dev_del_initiator_node_lun_acl(se_tpg, lun, lacl);
return 0;
@@ -708,7 +717,6 @@ static struct configfs_item_operations target_fabric_port_item_ops = {
.show_attribute = target_fabric_port_attr_show,
.store_attribute = target_fabric_port_attr_store,
.allow_link = target_fabric_port_link,
- .check_link = target_fabric_port_check_link,
.drop_link = target_fabric_port_unlink,
};

diff --git a/drivers/target/target_core_tpg.c b/drivers/target/target_core_tpg.c
index e598f2b..a895364 100644
--- a/drivers/target/target_core_tpg.c
+++ b/drivers/target/target_core_tpg.c
@@ -817,8 +817,6 @@ int core_tpg_post_dellun(
struct se_portal_group *tpg,
struct se_lun *lun)
{
- struct se_lun_acl *acl, *acl_tmp;
-
core_tpg_shutdown_lun(tpg, lun);

core_dev_unexport(lun->lun_se_dev, tpg, lun);
@@ -827,12 +825,6 @@ int core_tpg_post_dellun(
lun->lun_status = TRANSPORT_LUN_STATUS_FREE;
spin_unlock(&tpg->tpg_lun_lock);

- spin_lock(&lun->lun_acl_lock);
- list_for_each_entry_safe(acl, acl_tmp, &lun->lun_acl_list, lacl_list) {
- kfree(acl);
- }
- spin_unlock(&lun->lun_acl_lock);
-
return 0;
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(core_tpg_post_dellun);
--
1.5.6.5

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/