[PATCH] avoid second smp_processor_id() call in __touch_watchdog

[Sergey Senozhatsky]

Hello,

Per our previous conversation:

Andrew Morton wrote:
> Fair enough, although strictly speaking this should be done in a
> separate and later patch.
> 


Avoid double smp_processor_id() call in __touch_watchdog (smp_processor_id() 
itself and later call in __get_cpu_var())

Signed-off-by: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@xxxxxxxxx>

---

diff --git a/kernel/watchdog.c b/kernel/watchdog.c
index 7f9c3c5..03d97c5 100644
--- a/kernel/watchdog.c
+++ b/kernel/watchdog.c
@@ -116,8 +116,7 @@ static unsigned long get_sample_period(void)
 static void __touch_watchdog(void)
 {
 	int this_cpu = smp_processor_id();
-
-	__get_cpu_var(watchdog_touch_ts) = get_timestamp(this_cpu);
+	per_cpu(watchdog_touch_ts, this_cpu) = get_timestamp(this_cpu);
 }
 
 void touch_softlockup_watchdog(void)

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/