Re: [PATCH] net: core: dev.c: use spin_lock_irqsave() rather than

From: MichaÅ Nazarewicz
Date: Mon Sep 20 2010 - 13:05:38 EST


On Mon, 20 Sep 2010 18:14:07 +0200, David Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 20 Sep 2010 18:03:41 +0200

Hmm, while your patch is technically correct, it seems strange all this
stuff runs in hard irq context.

I would much rather this RNDIS query response handler get
scheduled to run into softirq context or similar instead.

I am not applying this patch.

Eh... I'll try to look at RNDIS than.

--
Best regards, _ _
| Humble Liege of Serenely Enlightened Majesty of o' \,=./ `o
| Computer Science, MichaÅ "mina86" Nazarewicz (o o)
+----[mina86*mina86.com]---[mina86*jabber.org]----ooO--(_)--Ooo--
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/