Re: [Stable-review] [064/123] sched: Protect task->cpus_allowedaccess in sched_getaffinity()

[Mike Galbraith]

On Sun, 2010-09-19 at 07:10 +0200, Mike Galbraith wrote:
> On Sat, 2010-09-18 at 21:32 +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > I'm somewhat disturbed by the number of non-trivial scheduler changes
> > here.  How well have these been tested as applied to the 2.6.32.y
> > branch?
> 
> All of them of course.

(parse error)

The patch set saw a lot of stress and benchmark hours on boxen large and
small, to be as sure as anyone can be that it was not going to upset the
enterprise apple cart, nor harm the desktop.

I call it heavily tested, but can't post a detailed log of everything
done on every box for others to decide for themselves, since I didn't
compile same.

	-Mike

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/