[010/123] sched: revert stable c6fc81a sched: Fix a race between ttwu() and migrate_task()

From: Greg KH
Date: Sat Sep 18 2010 - 15:51:50 EST


From: Mike Galbraith <efault@xxxxxx>

This commit does not appear to have been meant for 32-stable, and causes ltp's
cpusets testcases to fail, revert it.

Original commit text:

sched: Fix a race between ttwu() and migrate_task()

Based on commit e2912009fb7b715728311b0d8fe327a1432b3f79 upstream, but
done differently as this issue is not present in .33 or .34 kernels due
to rework in this area.

If a task is in the TASK_WAITING state, then try_to_wake_up() is working
on it, and it will place it on the correct cpu.

This commit ensures that neither migrate_task() nor __migrate_task()
calls set_task_cpu(p) while p is in the TASK_WAKING state. Otherwise,
there could be two concurrent calls to set_task_cpu(p), resulting in
the task's cfs_rq being inconsistent with its cpu.

Signed-off-by: Mike Galbraith <efault@xxxxxx>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxx>

---
kernel/sched.c | 9 ++++-----
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

--- a/kernel/sched.c
+++ b/kernel/sched.c
@@ -2123,10 +2123,12 @@ migrate_task(struct task_struct *p, int

/*
* If the task is not on a runqueue (and not running), then
- * the next wake-up will properly place the task.
+ * it is sufficient to simply update the task's cpu field.
*/
- if (!p->se.on_rq && !task_running(rq, p))
+ if (!p->se.on_rq && !task_running(rq, p)) {
+ set_task_cpu(p, dest_cpu);
return 0;
+ }

init_completion(&req->done);
req->task = p;
@@ -7217,9 +7219,6 @@ static int __migrate_task(struct task_st
/* Already moved. */
if (task_cpu(p) != src_cpu)
goto done;
- /* Waking up, don't get in the way of try_to_wake_up(). */
- if (p->state == TASK_WAKING)
- goto fail;
/* Affinity changed (again). */
if (!cpumask_test_cpu(dest_cpu, &p->cpus_allowed))
goto fail;


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/