Re: [PATCH v2] ARM: uaccess: Implement strict user copy checks

From: Arnd Bergmann
Date: Tue Sep 14 2010 - 09:10:57 EST


On Tuesday 14 September 2010, Heiko Carstens wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 08:07:52PM -0700, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> > Changing the buf_size variable from an int to a size_t makes the warning
> > go away. Perhaps this is because gcc can't reliably eliminate the else
> > case when the lower bound isn't 0? Overflow? I'm not really sure. Does
> > the kernel/kprobes.c part of this patch work for you?
>
> Yes, the warning goes away on s390 as well.

Ok, great!

In that case, I think we should just apply this patch to fix all these
warnings for good. There are probably some more in an x86_64 allyesconfig
build, but this should make s390 build cleanly again.

Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx>

diff --git a/drivers/net/tun.c b/drivers/net/tun.c
index 55f3a3e..0947e16 100644
--- a/drivers/net/tun.c
+++ b/drivers/net/tun.c
@@ -1185,7 +1185,7 @@ static int set_offload(struct net_device *dev, unsigned long arg)
}

static long __tun_chr_ioctl(struct file *file, unsigned int cmd,
- unsigned long arg, int ifreq_len)
+ unsigned long arg, size_t ifreq_len)
{
struct tun_file *tfile = file->private_data;
struct tun_struct *tun;
diff --git a/drivers/scsi/sg.c b/drivers/scsi/sg.c
index 13776a7..6fff2f2 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/sg.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/sg.c
@@ -2388,7 +2388,7 @@ static ssize_t
sg_proc_write_dressz(struct file *filp, const char __user *buffer,
size_t count, loff_t *off)
{
- int num;
+ size_t num;
unsigned long k = ULONG_MAX;
char buff[11];

diff --git a/fs/debugfs/file.c b/fs/debugfs/file.c
index 1b4db2c..c085561 100644
--- a/fs/debugfs/file.c
+++ b/fs/debugfs/file.c
@@ -428,7 +428,7 @@ static ssize_t write_file_bool(struct file *file, const char __user *user_buf,
size_t count, loff_t *ppos)
{
char buf[32];
- int buf_size;
+ size_t buf_size;
u32 *val = file->private_data;

buf_size = min(count, (sizeof(buf)-1));
diff --git a/net/compat.c b/net/compat.c
index 63d260e..4cc0ba9 100644
--- a/net/compat.c
+++ b/net/compat.c
@@ -774,7 +774,7 @@ asmlinkage long compat_sys_recvmmsg(int fd, struct compat_mmsghdr __user *mmsg,

asmlinkage long compat_sys_socketcall(int call, u32 __user *args)
{
- int ret;
+ size_t ret;
u32 a[6];
u32 a0, a1;

diff --git a/net/core/pktgen.c b/net/core/pktgen.c
index 10a1ea7..d9ee8b9 100644
--- a/net/core/pktgen.c
+++ b/net/core/pktgen.c
@@ -848,7 +848,8 @@ static ssize_t pktgen_if_write(struct file *file,
{
struct seq_file *seq = file->private_data;
struct pktgen_dev *pkt_dev = seq->private;
- int i = 0, max, len;
+ int i = 0, max;
+ size_t len;
char name[16], valstr[32];
unsigned long value = 0;
char *pg_result = NULL;
diff --git a/net/packet/af_packet.c b/net/packet/af_packet.c
index 9a17f28..fc1a4e0 100644
--- a/net/packet/af_packet.c
+++ b/net/packet/af_packet.c
@@ -2062,7 +2062,7 @@ packet_setsockopt(struct socket *sock, int level, int optname, char __user *optv
static int packet_getsockopt(struct socket *sock, int level, int optname,
char __user *optval, int __user *optlen)
{
- int len;
+ size_t len;
int val;
struct sock *sk = sock->sk;
struct packet_sock *po = pkt_sk(sk);

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/