Re: [RFC] Fix typos

[Jason Wessel]

On 09/02/2010 02:18 PM, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> On Thu, 2 Sep 2010 16:05:14 -0300 Lucas De Marchi wrote:
> 
>> Hi,
>>
>> I'd like to know if it's worth fixing all typos found in comments,
>> documentation and sometimes code. A first attempt to do that you can
>> find at http://people.profusion.mobi/~lucas/kernel-typos-fix.patch
>>
>> This was done by using the list of common typos available at
>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Lists_of_common_misspellings
>>
>> I already removed some false positives, but there are more. Before
>> going ahead and verifying all of them, I'd like to know whether this
>> would be a good patch.
> 
> Hi,
> 
> I'd take most of the corrections in Documentation/, but in general,
> I don't think that it's a good idea without some careful review.

I am in agreement with Randy on his point that any changes should get
reviewed if possible by the people who own the files or authored the
comments.

I reviewed all the pieces that were kdb / kgdb related which include
the following and all the changes are ok (one exception noted).

Documentation/kernel-parameters.txt
arch/cris/arch-v32/kernel/kgdb.c
drivers/misc/kgdbts.c
kernel/debug/kdb/kdb_main.c
kernel/debug/kdb/kdb_support.c

--- a/arch/x86/kernel/kgdb.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/kgdb.c
@@ -277,7 +277,7 @@ static int hw_break_release_slot(int breakno)
 		pevent = per_cpu_ptr(breakinfo[breakno].pev, cpu);
 		if (dbg_release_bp_slot(*pevent))
 			/*
-			 * The debugger is responisble for handing the retry on
+			 * The debugger is responsible for handing the retry on

---- from Jason ----

This should actually be:

+			 * The debugger is responsible for handling the retry on

--------------------

Thanks,
Jason.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/