Re: BTRFS: Unbelievably slow with kvm/qemu

[Ted Ts'o]

On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 02:58:44PM -0700, K. Richard Pixley wrote:
>  On 20100831 14:46, Mike Fedyk wrote:
> >There is little reason not to use duplicate metadata.  Only small
> >files (less than 2kb) get stored in the tree, so there should be no
> >worries about images being duplicated without data duplication set at
> >mkfs time.
> My benchmarks show that for my kinds of data, btrfs is somewhat
> slower than ext4, (which is slightly slower than ext3 which is
> somewhat slower than ext2), when using the defaults, (ie, duplicate
> metadata).
> 
> It's a hair faster than ext2, (the fastest of the ext family), when
> using singleton metadata.  And ext2 isn't even crash resistant while
> btrfs has snapshots.

I'm really, really curious.  Can you describe your data and your
workload in detail?  You mentioned "continuous builders"; is this some
kind of tinderbox setup?

						- Ted
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/