Re: [RFC 02/22] configfs: Add structconfigfs_item_operations->check_link() in configfs_unlink()

[Joel Becker]

On Thu, Sep 02, 2010 at 12:31:07AM -0400, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> On Monday 30 August 2010 05:20:25 Nicholas A. Bellinger wrote:
> > From: Nicholas Bellinger <nab@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >
> > This patch adds a optional struct configfs_item_operations->check_link()
> > check called in fs/configfs/symlink.c:configfs_unlink() that can be used by
> > configfs consumers to check for an explict struct config_group dependence
> > with active symlink and fail with -EPERM before the unlink(2) syscall is
> > allowed to occur.
> >
> > Currently without this patch, there is not a method that a consumer can
> > tell configfs_unlink() that it needs to fail for this particular case. 
> > Allowing ->check_link() to propigate up the errno to VFS is also another
> > option for the call, but currently for TCM using the existing -EPERM in
> > configfs_unlink() is fine here.
> >
> > Note this patch is used by TCM v4 generic configfs fabric module
> > infrastructure to allow  explict Initiator Port MappedLUNs symlinks to
> > create a dependency for the fabric TPG Port LUNs living in a configfs group
> > that is not a direct struct config_group parent.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Nicholas A. Bellinger <nab@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

	I NAK'd this a while back.  I'm willing to be convinced, but so
far it remains that way.

Joel

-- 

Life's Little Instruction Book #109

	"Know how to drive a stick shift."

Joel Becker
Consulting Software Developer
Oracle
E-mail: joel.becker@xxxxxxxxxx
Phone: (650) 506-8127
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/