Re: [PATCH 2/4] mfd: twl-core: switch over to defines in twl.h

[Samuel Ortiz]

Hi Felipe,

On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 10:16:19AM +0300, Felipe Balbi wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 09:10:22AM +0200, Balbi Felipe (Nokia-MS/Helsinki) wrote:
> >On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 09:03:44AM +0200, ext Gopinath, Thara wrote:
> >>>>No I am not talking about the key values. I was talking about the register offset
> >>>>for TWL4030_PM_MASTER_PROTECT_KEY. My question is, is it ok for it to be 0xd or 0xe.
> >>>>Earlier we were using 0xd and in the new implementation it has been changed to 0xe.
> >>
> >>Typo. Earlier we were using 0xe and in the new implementation it has
> >>been changed to 0xd.
> >
> >you're right, I'm not sure how I came up with that value since the TRM
> >shows 0x0e, maybe a copy&paste error. Will change patch 1.
> 
> ok, it's because there's no register 0x0a. And I missed that when
> defined the register space. Good catch, thanks. 
Should I expect a new patch then ?

Cheers,
Samuel.

-- 
Intel Open Source Technology Centre
http://oss.intel.com/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/