Re: tq 2440

[Russell King - ARM Linux]

On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 09:51:41AM -0700, Greg KH wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 05:35:26PM +0100, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> > On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 11:16:30PM +0800, Conke Hu wrote:
> > > ever notice to the following kernel log?
> > > "Device 's3c2440-nand' does not have a release() function, it is
> > > broken and must."
> > > release() function should be implemented  in the platform_device.
> > 
> > That's not telling you to provide a release function.  The warning is
> > telling you that a device is being unregistered which doesn't have a
> > release function.
> > 
> > Consider this point - maybe it doesn't have a release function because
> > it's not supposed to be unregistered?
> 
> Heh, well, it is being unregistered, and at that point in time, the
> kernel complains.

The unregistration occurs because platform_register_devices() (which is
used by arch code to register a block of platform devices) undoes its
work if one of the devices fails to register.

I've long since thought, since I created that function, that this probably
isn't desirable behaviour, and it should continue to register as many
devices as it possibly can.

> All kobjects need a release function that actually frees it.  If not,
> that is a logic bug.  Please see the Documentation/kobject.txt file for
> details.

How do you free a statically declared platform device?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/