Re: [PATCH 12/40] x86, compat: convert ia32 layer to use

[Frederic Weisbecker]

On Wed, Jun 23, 2010 at 12:14:02PM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> Any reason we need to differenciate between COMPAT_SYSCALL_DEFINE and
> ARCH_COMPAT_SYSCALL_DEFINE?  We don't need this for native system calls,
> so I can't see the reason to do it for compat system calls.
> 


I think we wanted that to keep the sys32_ prefixed based naming, to avoid
collisions with generic compat handler names.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/