Re: [RFC][PATCH 9/9] make kvm mmu shrinker more aggressive

[Dave Hansen]

On Sun, 2010-06-20 at 11:11 +0300, Avi Kivity wrote:
> > That changes a few things.  I bet all the contention we were seeing was
> > just from nr_to_scan=0 calls and not from actual shrink operations.
> > Perhaps we should just stop this set after patch 4.
> >    
> 
> At the very least, we should re-measure things. 

Sure.  I'll go back to the folks that found this in the first place and
see how these patches affect the contention we were seeing.

-- Dave

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/