Re: [patch] x86, pat: freeing invalid memtype messages

[Xiaotian Feng]

On 06/21/2010 07:02 PM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Mon, 2010-06-21 at 18:56 +0800, Xiaotian Feng wrote:
>
> > I guess there might be something wrong between the augmented rbtree insert/remove ..
>
> The easiest thing is to revert that change and try again, the next step
> would be to print the full RB tree on each modification and look where
> it goes wrong.
>
> That said, I did print my fair share of (augmented) RB trees while
> playing with scheduler patches and I can't remember it ever having
> messed up like that.
He's using 2.6.35-rc2+, without your "rbtree: Undo augmented trees 
performance damage" patch ;-)

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/