Re: [RESEND][REGRESSION] um: CONFIG_STATIC_LINK=y broken

[richard -rw- weinberger]

On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 10:01 PM, Geert Uytterhoeven
<geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 19:50, richard -rw- weinberger
> <richard.weinberger@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 7:17 PM, Geert Uytterhoeven
>> <geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 17:22, richard -rw- weinberger
>>> <richard.weinberger@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>> On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 4:27 PM, Geert Uytterhoeven
>>>> <geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>> On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 15:49, richard -rw- weinberger
>>>>> <richard.weinberger@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>>> Andrew, Linus, Jeff, ... anyone?
>>>>>> Please apply this patch.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> CONFIG_STATIC_LINK is still broken. :(
>>>>>
>>>>> I wanted to verify Tim's patch, but after enabling CONFIG_STATIC_LINK,
>>>>> it fails to link
>>>>> (with or without your patch):
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> BTW: Does CONFIG_STATIC_LINK work for you when you revert commit
>>>> 5d150a97f9391f5bcd7ba0d59d7a11c3de3cea80 (um: Clean up linker script
>>>> using standard macros)?
>>>
>>> Still the same linking errors ;-(
>>>
>>
>> Are you using a non-x86 environment?
>> Maybe CONFIG_STATIC_LINK is more broken than i thought.
>
> I'm using amd64 on Ubuntu 10.04.
>

Can please you test this patch?
http://groups.google.com/group/fa.linux.kernel/browse_thread/thread/03cd264b00551949?pli=1


-- 
Cheers,
//richard
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/