Re: [PATCH] HID: Documentation for hidraw

[Alan Ott]

On 06/18/2010 07:59 AM, Jiri Kosina wrote:
> > Documenation for the hidraw driver.
> >      
> Thanks a lot for writing this up, Alan. It's something that has been
> lingering on my TODO for just too long, it's great that someone finally
> got fed up with it and wrote it :)
>
>    
I wouldn't say I was fed up :)
> >   I'm sure someone here will have a better idea where
> >   to put this than the root of Documentation/. I didn't see a better place, as
> >   hidraw is used for both Bluetooth and USB.
> >      
> Either Documentation/input comes to mind, or we could even establish
> Documentation/hid directory as well.
>
>    
Antonio suggested the same, putting hidraw.txt and hiddev.txt into a new 
Documentation/hid/ directory. I'll do this for the next rev unless I 
hear otherwise.

> >   Documentation/hidraw.txt |  283 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >   1 files changed, 283 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
> >   create mode 100644 Documentation/hidraw.txt
> >
> > diff --git a/Documentation/hidraw.txt b/Documentation/hidraw.txt
> > new file mode 100644
> > index 0000000..7153a06
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/Documentation/hidraw.txt
> > @@ -0,0 +1,283 @@
> > +      HIDRAW - Raw Access to USB and Bluetooth Human Interface Devices
> > +     ==================================================================
> > +
> > +The hidraw driver provides a raw interface to USB and Bluetooth Human
> > +Interface Devices (HIDs).  It differs from hiddev in that reports sent and
> > +received are not parsed by the HID parser, but are sent to and received from
> > +the device unmodified.
> >      
> The important point behind hidraw (compared to hiddev), always has been
> that it's in fact completely independent on underlying hardware transport
> protocol. Currently there are no other implementations of HID than the
> ones using Bluetooth or USB, but there is no general obstacle to using
> hidraw once any vendor comes with HID-over-FibreChannel :) for example.
>
> This basic principle might be worth mentioning as well.
>
>    
I'll make sure to put that in.

> > +Hidraw should be used if the userspace application knows exactly how to
> > +communicate with the hardware device, and is able to construct the HID
> > +reports manually.  This is often the case when making userspace drivers for
> > +custom HID devices.
> > +
> > +Hidraw is also useful for communicating with non-conformant HID devices
> > +which send and receive data in a way that is inconsistent with their report
> > +descriptors.  Because hiddev parses reports which are sent and received
> > +through it and checks them against the device's report descriptor, such
> > +communication with these non-conformant devices is impossible using hiddev.
> >      
> hidraw is just one of the alternatives here of course. Writing in-kernel
> driver also can be done to overcome these obstacles.
>
>    
Also true. I'll add it.

Thanks,

Alan.


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/