Re: [PATCH 1/9] oom: don't try to kill oom_unkillable child

From: KOSAKI Motohiro
Date: Wed Jun 16 2010 - 21:56:46 EST


> On Wed, Jun 16, 2010 at 08:29:13PM +0900, KOSAKI Motohiro wrote:
> > Now, badness() doesn't care neigher CPUSET nor mempolicy. Then
> > if the victim child process have disjoint nodemask, __out_of_memory()
> > can makes kernel hang eventually.
> >
> > This patch fixes it.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Reviewed-by: Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@xxxxxxxxx>
>
> This patch inclues two things.
>
> 1. consider cpuset and mempolicy in oom_kill_process
> 2. Simplify mempolicy oom check with nodemask != NULL
> in select_bad_process.
>
> 1) change behavior but 2) is just cleanup.
> It should have been in another patch to reivew easily. :)

Thank you. removed (2).



--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/