Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH RFC] virtio: put last seen used index intoring itself

[Avi Kivity]

On 05/23/2010 07:30 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
>    
> > > Maybe we should use atomics on index then?
> > >
> > >        
> > This should only be helpful if you access the cacheline several times in
> > a row.  That's not the case in virtio (or here).
> >      
> So why does it help?
>    

We actually do access the cacheline several times in a row here (but not 
in virtio?):

> 		case SHARE:
> 			while (count<  MAX_BOUNCES) {
> 				/* Spin waiting for other side to change it. */
> 				while (counter->cacheline1 != count);
>    

Broadcast a read request.

> 				count++;
> 				counter->cacheline1 = count;
>    

Broadcast an invalidate request.

> 				count++;
> 			}
> 			break;
>
> 		case LOCKSHARE:
> 			while (count<  MAX_BOUNCES) {
> 				/* Spin waiting for other side to change it. */
> 				while (__sync_val_compare_and_swap(&counter->cacheline1, count, count+1)
> 				       != count);
>    

Broadcast a 'read for ownership' request.

> 				count += 2;
> 			}
> 			break;
>    

So RMW should certainly by faster using single-instruction RMW 
operations (or using prefetchw).

--
Do not meddle in the internals of kernels, for they are subtle and quick to panic.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/