Re: [RFC patch] extable and module add object is static

[Mathieu Desnoyers]

* Tejun Heo (tj@xxxxxxxxxx) wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> On 03/29/2010 10:16 PM, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
> > That's great! Tejun, can you point me out to an update version of these
> > patches ? I am particularly interested in being able to know the range of
> > statically defined per-cpu data.
> 
>   http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/958794/focus=959493
> 
> These were waiting for Rusty's ACK.  They got ACKed today and will be
> pushed to mainline through percpu tree soonish.

OK. I just figured that I could initialize the rcu_heads in all cases in the
debugobject fixup anyway, so I guess I won't need "object_is_static()" after
all. But I can keep the patch around so it can eventually be re-sent to
standardize the debugobjects activation fixups. They currently need to keep a
flag around to identify statically defined objects.

Thanks,

Mathieu

> 
> Thanks.
> 
> -- 
> tejun

-- 
Mathieu Desnoyers
Operating System Efficiency R&D Consultant
EfficiOS Inc.
http://www.efficios.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/