Re: [PATCH 11/11] Do not compact within a preferred zone after acompaction failure

From: Mel Gorman
Date: Tue Mar 23 2010 - 14:40:00 EST


On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 01:31:43PM -0500, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> On Tue, 23 Mar 2010, Mel Gorman wrote:
>
> > The fragmentation index may indicate that a failure it due to external
>
> s/it/is/
>

Correct.

> > fragmentation, a compaction run complete and an allocation failure still
>
> ???
>

I was having some sort of fit when I wrote that obviously. Try this on
for size

The fragmentation index may indicate that a failure is due to external
fragmentation but after a compaction run completes, it is still possible
for an allocation to fail.

> > fail. There are two obvious reasons as to why
> >
> > o Page migration cannot move all pages so fragmentation remains
> > o A suitable page may exist but watermarks are not met
> >
> > In the event of compaction and allocation failure, this patch prevents
> > compaction happening for a short interval. It's only recorded on the
>
> compaction is "recorded"? deferred?
>

deferred makes more sense.

What I was thinking at the time was that compact_resume was stored in struct
zone - i.e. that is where it is recorded.

> > preferred zone but that should be enough coverage. This could have been
> > implemented similar to the zonelist_cache but the increased size of the
> > zonelist did not appear to be justified.
>
> > @@ -1787,6 +1787,9 @@ __alloc_pages_direct_reclaim(gfp_t gfp_mask, unsigned int order,
> > */
> > count_vm_event(COMPACTFAIL);
> >
> > + /* On failure, avoid compaction for a short time. */
> > + defer_compaction(preferred_zone, jiffies + HZ/50);
> > +
>
> 20ms? How was that interval determined?
>

Matches the time the page allocator would defer to an event like
congestion. The choice is somewhat arbitrary. Ideally, there would be
some sort of event that would re-enable compaction but there wasn't an
obvious candidate so I used time.

--
Mel Gorman
Part-time Phd Student Linux Technology Center
University of Limerick IBM Dublin Software Lab
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/