Re: [PATCH v1 7/10] Uprobes Implementation

[Peter Zijlstra]

On Tue, 2010-03-23 at 20:35 +0530, Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli wrote:
> Now the question is, where the complexity needs to be.

Both in-tree consumers of uprobes (ftrace and perf) are capable of task
filters.

But the thing is, dso:sym is very much not a task property, adding task
filters afterwards sure makes sense in some cases but it should not be
the primary mode.

If people really want to optimize this we can easily add a few bits of
task state which could tell the trap handler to not even bother looking
up things but restart as fast as possible.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/