Re: Writable limits (was Re: Linux 2.6.34-rc1)

[Pavel Machek]

Hi!

> > > It's out there now. I still have a few trees I already got pull requests 
> > > for, and that I want to look over a bit more (ceph, gdb tree etc), and 
> > > it's possible that I've just overlooked some other pull request.
> > > 
> > > So if you feel like you sent me a pull request bit might have been 
> > > over-looked, please point that out to me
> > 
> > Hi, yes, the writable limits tree:
> > http://lkml.org/lkml/2010/3/5/219
> > 
> > Maybe it was ignored on purpose. Either way, I would like to know to
> > decide whether to drop it from -next or not and wait for a 2.6.35 merge
> > window.
> 
> Seems like this was neither commented on, nor merged. I don't see any 
> serious objections to having this merged having been raised anywhere ...
> 
> Any word on this?

Maybe noone cars? Try to push it through akpm?
									Pavel
-- 
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/