Re: [PATCH 0/5] V2 usb console improvements series

[Jason Wessel]

On 03/17/2010 09:30 AM, Alan Stern wrote:
> On Tue, 16 Mar 2010, Jason Wessel wrote:
>
>   
>> Part of having the console stable requires that usb sysrq handler get
>> executed in a tasklet.  The hcd device lock is always held while the
>> driver call backs are executed.  The means you cannot get the sysrq
>> printk's out to the usb console device after the in_flight urb queue
>> is filled.
>>     
>
> Either I don't understand this comment properly or else it is simply
> wrong.  HCDs do not continue to hold their locks when handing completed
> URBs back to drivers.  The giveback call occurs with interrupts
> disabled, but no locks are held.
>
>   

The call back from the urb processing holds a lock.  The sysrq is
invoked from that context, which will do a whole lot of printk()
(sysrq-t for example).   The problem is that writes will queue for a bit
and then cannot get drained because the hcd lock is not available. 
Using a tasklet seemed like the obvious choice to move the sysrq
processing to a context where the hcd lock is not likely to be in use.

> Does this mean one of the patches in your series can be simplified?
>   

I will further simplify if you have some recommendations.

Thanks,
Jason.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/