Re: [PATCH][RF C/T/D] Unmapped page cache control - via boot parameter

From: Christoph Hellwig
Date: Wed Mar 17 2010 - 04:49:56 EST


On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 01:08:28PM +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
> If the batch size is larger than the virtio queue size, or if there are
> no flushes at all, then yes the huge write cache gives more opportunity
> for reordering. But we're already talking hundreds of requests here.

Yes. And rememember those don't have to come from the same host. Also
remember that we rather limit execssive reodering of O_DIRECT requests
in the I/O scheduler because they are "synchronous" type I/O while
we don't do that for pagecache writeback.

And we don't have unlimited virtio queue size, in fact it's quite
limited.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/