[PATCH resend 0/3] sdhci-pltfm: Few additions and enhancements

From: Anton Vorontsov
Date: Tue Mar 16 2010 - 14:34:10 EST


On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 11:11:00PM +0300, Anton Vorontsov wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 07:55:30PM +0000, David Vrabel wrote:
> > Anton Vorontsov wrote:
> > > Some hosts (e.g. as found in CNS3xxx SOCs) report wrong value in
> > > CLOCK_BASE capability field, and currently there is no way to
> > > force the SDHCI core to use the platform-provided base clock value.
> >
> > I don't think this needs a new quirk. Change the sdhci driver to check
> > if the platform provides a value before reading the standard register.
>
> Well, Pierre once said that by default we should conform to the
> SDHCI spec, and any diviations from the spec should be handled by
> the quirks:
>
> http://linux.derkeiler.com/Mailing-Lists/Kernel/2009-02/msg03385.html
>
> Spec clearly states that base clock == 0 is the case when we should
> fall back to the platform-provided clocks.

No further comments, resending the patches...

Thanks,

--
Anton Vorontsov
email: cbouatmailru@xxxxxxxxx
irc://irc.freenode.net/bd2
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/