Re: [PATCH] Enhance perf to collect KVM guest os statistics from host side

[Frank Ch. Eigler]

Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx> writes:

> [...]
>> >I.e. we really want to be able users to:
>> >
>> >  1) have it all working with a single guest, without having to specify 'which'
>> >     guest (qemu PID) to work with. That is the dominant usecase both for
>> >     developers and for a fair portion of testers.
>> 
>> That's reasonable if we can get it working simply.
>
> IMO such ease of use is reasonable and required, full stop.
> If it cannot be gotten simply then that's a bug: either in the code, or in the 
> design, or in the development process that led to the design. Bugs need 
> fixing. [...]

Perhaps the fact that kvm happens to deal with an interesting
application area (virtualization) is misleading here.  As far as the
host kernel or other host userspace is concerned, qemu is just some
random unprivileged userspace program (with some *optional* /dev/kvm
services that might happen to require temporary root).

As such, perf trying to instrument qemu is no different than perf
trying to instrument any other userspace widget.  Therefore, expecting
'trusted enumeration' of instances is just as sensible as using
'trusted ps' and 'trusted /var/run/FOO.pid files'.


- FChE
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/