Re: [PATCH v4 04/11] swiotlb: support NOT_COHERENT_CACHE PowerPCplatforms

[Albert Herranz]

FUJITA Tomonori wrote:
> If we want to make swiotlb generic (make on any architectures), we
> need to handle more cache issues here, I think. So it's better to have
> more generic ways instead of adding hooks to some archs.
> 

Ok. So what would be an acceptable way of handling this in a generic way?
Should we for example have 2 levels of DMA ops in the swiotlb case (swiotlb and "actual") and call the 2nd level ("actual") from the swiotlb code whenever we need to act on non-bounced buffers?
Any other ideas?

Thanks,
Albert

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/