Re: [PATCH][GIT PULL] ftrace: Add function names to dangling } infunction graph tracer

[Frederic Weisbecker]

On Sat, Feb 27, 2010 at 02:25:03PM -0500, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Sat, 2010-02-27 at 11:02 +0100, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> 
> > >  		/*
> > >  		 * Comments display at + 1 to depth. Since
> > >  		 * this is a leaf function, keep the comments
> > >  		 * equal to this depth.
> > >  		 */
> > > -		*depth = call->depth - 1;
> > > +		cpu_data->depth = call->depth - 1;
> > > +
> > > +		/* No need to keep this function around for this depth */
> > > +		if (call->depth < FTRACE_RETFUNC_DEPTH)
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > Do you really need to check that? call->depth >= FTRACE_RETFUNC_DEPTH
> > are not recorded.
> > 
> > 
> 
> Call me paranoid, but working inside the kernel makes me paranoid. If
> for some reason a trace gets corrupted here, not doing this check can
> cause a kernel oops.


Ok but this may also hide a bug.

Could it be a WARN_ON_ONCE?


 
> > 
> > > +			cpu_data->enter_funcs[call->depth] = 0;
> 
> cpu_data->enter_funcs[102340320211] = 0;
> 
> would be bad ;-)
> 
> 
> Hmm, I should also make sure depth is not less than zero. I'll send a
> new patch to do that too.



With a WARN_ON_ONCE? :)


Thanks.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/