Re: [git patch] atang tree: fix 2.6.32 SSD performance regression

[Jens Axboe]

On Mon, Feb 22 2010, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
> DISCLAIMER: the fact of getting patches merged into atang tree means
> that from now on they will be getting updates for changes happening
> in atang tree and it should not be treated as an indication regarding
> decisions taken by 'upstream' kernel trees
> 
> 
> Fix 2.6.32 regression bringing back the desired SSD performance.
> 
> [ 'upstream' may want to wait for a proper resolution, for atang tree
>   performance of big non-ATA boxes owned by a very few people is not
>   of such a big concern as a major regression on a commodity hardware ]

What is the point of this, other than continuing your past history of
political tirades?

-- 
Jens Axboe

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/