Re: x86: get rid of the insane TIF_ABI_PENDING bit

[H. Peter Anvin]

On 02/15/2010 11:41 AM, Roland McGrath wrote:
> It affects whatever uses is_compat_task(), but I can't see anything
> where that matters except inside some particular syscall or for
> syscall restart after signals.

FWIW, the origin of this is checkin
4d9bc79cd28b779610d9590b3a96a28a0f64a25a (2.6.18-rc1), which somewhat
unhelpfully states "Make sure is_compat_task works early".  It doesn't
specify what the failure is if is_compat_task doesn't work early.  On
the other hand, it sure as heck seems better to set it and not need it
than the other way around.

	-hpa

-- 
H. Peter Anvin, Intel Open Source Technology Center
I work for Intel.  I don't speak on their behalf.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/