Re: [PATCH 09/35] x86: print out for RAM buffer

[Andrew Morton]

On Tue, 09 Feb 2010 11:32:20 -0800
Yinghai Lu <yinghai@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> so could check that early in bootlog
> 
> Acked-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Reviewed-by: Christoph Lameter <cl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  arch/x86/kernel/e820.c |    3 +++
>  1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/e820.c b/arch/x86/kernel/e820.c
> index a966b75..dfb1689 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/e820.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/e820.c
> @@ -1429,6 +1429,9 @@ void __init e820_reserve_resources_late(void)
>  			end = MAX_RESOURCE_SIZE;
>  		if (start >= end)
>  			continue;
> +		printk(KERN_DEBUG "reserve RAM buffer: %016Lx - %016Lx ",
> +			       (unsigned long long) start,
> +			       (unsigned long long) end);
>  		reserve_region_with_split(&iomem_resource, start, end,
>  					  "RAM buffer");
>  	}

The typecasts for printing u64's are unneeded within x86 code.  In fact
I think they're now unneeded on all architectures.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/