Re: [PATCH 5/6] syscalls: add define syscall prefix macro

[Arnd Bergmann]

On Monday 08 February 2010, Jason Baron wrote:
> So I was trying to keep the names of the arch ia32 compat sys calls the
> same, ie 'sys32_blah'. However, I agree a common naming scheme makes
> more sense. what about 'arch_compat_sys_blah'? So as to distinguish from
> the common compat syscalls 'compat_sys_blah'.

Why do you need to distinguish them? I would hope that we never need to
have a kernel with both a generic and an arch specific compat version
of the same syscall.

	Arnd
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/