Re: [2.6.33-rc5] tty: possible irq lock inversion dependency intty_fasync

[Tetsuo Handa]

Greg KH wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 06, 2010 at 10:46:01PM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> > 
> > 
> > On Sat, 6 Feb 2010, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> > > 
> > > Yeah. I think we need to just revert that commit.
> > > 
> > > Or maybe we could just do the following, rather than revert it outright: 
> > > just get a ref to the 'struct pid' while holding the spinlock, and then 
> > > releasing it after doing the __f_setown() call.
> > 
> > Btw, if we do this, then we should probably revert commit 
> > b04da8bfdfbbd79544cab2fadfdc12e87eb01600 at the same time.
> > 
> > Resulting patch would then look like the appended.
> 
> The patch looks correct to me, thanks for fixing this.
> 
>   Acked-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxx>
> 
> Can you commit it to your tree, or do you need/want me to submit it?
> 
> thanks,
> 
> greg k-h
> 
That patch solved the lockdep warning.

Thank you.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/