[PATCH] Staging: rtl8192e: fix spacing style issues inr8180_93cx6.c

From: Tim Schofield
Date: Fri Feb 05 2010 - 03:55:33 EST


>From ffe4ef649fc0bcd553d8901492a5385a42be585a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Tim Schofield <tim@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 4 Feb 2010 18:28:48 +0000
Subject: [PATCH] Staging: rtl8192e: fix spacing style issues in r8180_93cx6.c
This is a patch to the r8180_93cx6.c file that fixes up spacing issue warnings found by the checkpatch.pl tool
Signed-off-by: Tim Schofield <tim@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

---
drivers/staging/rtl8192e/r8180_93cx6.c | 63 ++++++++++++++++----------------
1 files changed, 32 insertions(+), 31 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/staging/rtl8192e/r8180_93cx6.c b/drivers/staging/rtl8192e/r8180_93cx6.c
index 79f7a0f..262ed5f 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/rtl8192e/r8180_93cx6.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/rtl8192e/r8180_93cx6.c
@@ -22,7 +22,7 @@

static void eprom_cs(struct net_device *dev, short bit)
{
- if(bit)
+ if (bit)
write_nic_byte(dev, EPROM_CMD,
(1<<EPROM_CS_SHIFT) | \
read_nic_byte(dev, EPROM_CMD)); //enable EPROM
@@ -38,23 +38,23 @@ static void eprom_cs(struct net_device *dev, short bit)
static void eprom_ck_cycle(struct net_device *dev)
{
write_nic_byte(dev, EPROM_CMD,
- (1<<EPROM_CK_SHIFT) | read_nic_byte(dev,EPROM_CMD));
+ (1<<EPROM_CK_SHIFT) | read_nic_byte(dev, EPROM_CMD));
force_pci_posting(dev);
udelay(EPROM_DELAY);
write_nic_byte(dev, EPROM_CMD,
- read_nic_byte(dev, EPROM_CMD) &~ (1<<EPROM_CK_SHIFT));
+ read_nic_byte(dev, EPROM_CMD) & ~(1<<EPROM_CK_SHIFT));
force_pci_posting(dev);
udelay(EPROM_DELAY);
}


-static void eprom_w(struct net_device *dev,short bit)
+static void eprom_w(struct net_device *dev, short bit)
{
- if(bit)
+ if (bit)
write_nic_byte(dev, EPROM_CMD, (1<<EPROM_W_SHIFT) | \
- read_nic_byte(dev,EPROM_CMD));
+ read_nic_byte(dev, EPROM_CMD));
else
- write_nic_byte(dev, EPROM_CMD, read_nic_byte(dev,EPROM_CMD)\
+ write_nic_byte(dev, EPROM_CMD, read_nic_byte(dev, EPROM_CMD)\
&~(1<<EPROM_W_SHIFT));

force_pci_posting(dev);
@@ -66,10 +66,11 @@ static short eprom_r(struct net_device *dev)
{
short bit;

- bit=(read_nic_byte(dev, EPROM_CMD) & (1<<EPROM_R_SHIFT) );
+ bit = (read_nic_byte(dev, EPROM_CMD) & (1<<EPROM_R_SHIFT));
udelay(EPROM_DELAY);

- if(bit) return 1;
+ if (bit)
+ return 1;
return 0;
}

@@ -78,7 +79,7 @@ static void eprom_send_bits_string(struct net_device *dev, short b[], int len)
{
int i;

- for(i=0; i<len; i++){
+ for (i = 0; i < len; i++) {
eprom_w(dev, b[i]);
eprom_ck_cycle(dev);
}
@@ -88,37 +89,37 @@ static void eprom_send_bits_string(struct net_device *dev, short b[], int len)
u32 eprom_read(struct net_device *dev, u32 addr)
{
struct r8192_priv *priv = ieee80211_priv(dev);
- short read_cmd[]={1,1,0};
+ short read_cmd[] = {1, 1, 0};
short addr_str[8];
int i;
int addr_len;
u32 ret;

- ret=0;
+ ret = 0;
//enable EPROM programming
write_nic_byte(dev, EPROM_CMD,
(EPROM_CMD_PROGRAM<<EPROM_CMD_OPERATING_MODE_SHIFT));
force_pci_posting(dev);
udelay(EPROM_DELAY);

- if (priv->epromtype==EPROM_93c56){
- addr_str[7]=addr & 1;
- addr_str[6]=addr & (1<<1);
- addr_str[5]=addr & (1<<2);
- addr_str[4]=addr & (1<<3);
- addr_str[3]=addr & (1<<4);
- addr_str[2]=addr & (1<<5);
- addr_str[1]=addr & (1<<6);
- addr_str[0]=addr & (1<<7);
- addr_len=8;
- }else{
- addr_str[5]=addr & 1;
- addr_str[4]=addr & (1<<1);
- addr_str[3]=addr & (1<<2);
- addr_str[2]=addr & (1<<3);
- addr_str[1]=addr & (1<<4);
- addr_str[0]=addr & (1<<5);
- addr_len=6;
+ if (priv->epromtype == EPROM_93c56) {
+ addr_str[7] = addr & 1;
+ addr_str[6] = addr & (1<<1);
+ addr_str[5] = addr & (1<<2);
+ addr_str[4] = addr & (1<<3);
+ addr_str[3] = addr & (1<<4);
+ addr_str[2] = addr & (1<<5);
+ addr_str[1] = addr & (1<<6);
+ addr_str[0] = addr & (1<<7);
+ addr_len = 8;
+ } else {
+ addr_str[5] = addr & 1;
+ addr_str[4] = addr & (1<<1);
+ addr_str[3] = addr & (1<<2);
+ addr_str[2] = addr & (1<<3);
+ addr_str[1] = addr & (1<<4);
+ addr_str[0] = addr & (1<<5);
+ addr_len = 6;
}
eprom_cs(dev, 1);
eprom_ck_cycle(dev);
@@ -129,7 +130,7 @@ u32 eprom_read(struct net_device *dev, u32 addr)
//I'm unsure if it is necessary, but anyway shouldn't hurt
eprom_w(dev, 0);

- for(i=0;i<16;i++){
+ for (i = 0; i < 16; i++) {
//eeprom needs a clk cycle between writing opcode&adr
//and reading data. (eeprom outs a dummy 0)
eprom_ck_cycle(dev);
--
1.6.3.3



--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/