Re: [RFC Patch] net: reserve ports for applications using fixedport numbers

From: David Miller
Date: Thu Feb 04 2010 - 13:21:08 EST


From: Octavian Purdila <opurdila@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 4 Feb 2010 20:15:51 +0200

> int inet_is_reserved_local_port(int port)
> {
> if (test_bit(port, reserved_ports))
> return 1;
> return 0;
> }
>
> In theory it might be slower because of the reserved_ports bitmap will have a
> larger memory footprint than just a min/max, especially with random port
> allocation. But is this an issue in practice?

No need to speculate, some simple benchmarks would confirm or deny
this.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/