[PATCH -mm 4/4] um: remove dma_sync_single_range

From: FUJITA Tomonori
Date: Wed Feb 03 2010 - 22:15:34 EST


dma_sync_single_for_cpu/for_device supports a partial sync so there is
no point to have dma_sync_single_range (also dma_sync_single was
obsoleted long ago, replaced with dma_sync_single_for_cpu/for_device).

There is no user of dma_sync_single_range() in mainline and only Alpha
architecture supports dma_sync_single_range(). So it's unlikely that
someone out of the tree uses it.

Signed-off-by: FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Jeff Dike <jdike@xxxxxxxxxxx>
---
arch/um/include/asm/dma-mapping.h | 8 --------
1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/um/include/asm/dma-mapping.h b/arch/um/include/asm/dma-mapping.h
index 378de4b..b948c14 100644
--- a/arch/um/include/asm/dma-mapping.h
+++ b/arch/um/include/asm/dma-mapping.h
@@ -104,14 +104,6 @@ dma_get_cache_alignment(void)
}

static inline void
-dma_sync_single_range(struct device *dev, dma_addr_t dma_handle,
- unsigned long offset, size_t size,
- enum dma_data_direction direction)
-{
- BUG();
-}
-
-static inline void
dma_cache_sync(struct device *dev, void *vaddr, size_t size,
enum dma_data_direction direction)
{
--
1.5.6.5

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/