Re: [RFC][PATCH] PM: disable nonboot cpus before suspending devices

From: Andrew Morton
Date: Wed Feb 03 2010 - 20:22:20 EST


On Thu, 4 Feb 2010 01:50:26 +0100 "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@xxxxxxx> wrote:

> --- linux-2.6.orig/mm/page_alloc.c
> +++ linux-2.6/mm/page_alloc.c
> @@ -76,6 +76,30 @@ unsigned long totalreserve_pages __read_
> int percpu_pagelist_fraction;
> gfp_t gfp_allowed_mask __read_mostly = GFP_BOOT_MASK;
>
> +/*
> + * The following functions are used by the suspend/hibernate code to temporarily
> + * change gfp_allowed_mask in order to avoid using I/O during memory allocations
> + * while devices are suspended. To avoid races with the suspend/hibernate code,
> + * they should always be called with pm_mutex held (gfp_allowed_mask also should
> + * only be modified with pm_mutex held, unless the suspend/hibernate code is
> + * guaranteed not to run in parallel with that modification).
> + */
> +
> +void set_gfp_allowed_mask(gfp_t mask)
> +{
> + WARN_ON(!mutex_is_locked(&pm_mutex));
> + gfp_allowed_mask = mask;
> +}
> +
> +gfp_t clear_gfp_allowed_mask(gfp_t mask)
> +{
> + gfp_t ret = gfp_allowed_mask;
> +
> + WARN_ON(!mutex_is_locked(&pm_mutex));
> + gfp_allowed_mask &= ~mask;
> + return ret;
> +}

Maybe put an ifdef CONFIG_foo around these so they don't get included
when they're unneeded?

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/