[PATCH, RFC 14/14] m32r: use generic ptrace_resume code

From: Christoph Hellwig
Date: Tue Feb 02 2010 - 14:01:28 EST


Use the generic ptrace_resume code for PTRACE_SYSCALL, PTRACE_CONT,
PTRACE_KILL and PTRACE_SINGLESTEP. This implies defining
arch_has_single_step in <asm/ptrace.h> and implementing the
user_enable_single_step and user_disable_single_step functions, which
also causes the breakpoint information to be cleared on fork, which
could be considered a bug fix.

Also the TIF_SYSCALL_TRACE thread flag is now cleared on PTRACE_KILL
which it previously wasn't, which is consistent with all architectures
using the modern ptrace code.

The old code only disables the breakpoints on PTRACE_KILL, while after
this patch this also happens for PTRACE_CONT and PTRACE_SYSCALL which
matches the behaviour of the other architetures. I think this is a
bugfixes, but please double verify this is correct.

Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>

Index: linux-2.6/arch/m32r/include/asm/ptrace.h
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/arch/m32r/include/asm/ptrace.h 2010-02-02 19:26:37.456003660 +0100
+++ linux-2.6/arch/m32r/include/asm/ptrace.h 2010-02-02 19:26:49.405264333 +0100
@@ -120,6 +120,8 @@ struct pt_regs {

#include <asm/m32r.h> /* M32R_PSW_BSM, M32R_PSW_BPM */

+#define arch_has_single_step() (1)
+
struct task_struct;
extern void init_debug_traps(struct task_struct *);
#define arch_ptrace_attach(child) \
Index: linux-2.6/arch/m32r/kernel/ptrace.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/arch/m32r/kernel/ptrace.c 2010-02-02 19:26:54.353253780 +0100
+++ linux-2.6/arch/m32r/kernel/ptrace.c 2010-02-02 19:29:39.935253922 +0100
@@ -580,6 +580,35 @@ init_debug_traps(struct task_struct *chi
}
}

+void user_enable_single_step(struct task_struct *child)
+{
+ unsigned long next_pc;
+ unsigned long pc, insn;
+
+ clear_tsk_thread_flag(child, TIF_SYSCALL_TRACE);
+
+ /* Compute next pc. */
+ pc = get_stack_long(child, PT_BPC);
+
+ if (access_process_vm(child, pc&~3, &insn, sizeof(insn), 0)
+ != sizeof(insn))
+ break;
+
+ compute_next_pc(insn, pc, &next_pc, child);
+ if (next_pc & 0x80000000)
+ break;
+
+ if (embed_debug_trap(child, next_pc))
+ break;
+
+ invalidate_cache();
+}
+
+void user_disable_single_step(struct task_struct *child)
+{
+ unregister_all_debug_traps(child);
+ invalidate_cache();
+}

/*
* Called by kernel/ptrace.c when detaching..
@@ -612,74 +641,6 @@ arch_ptrace(struct task_struct *child, l
ret = ptrace_write_user(child, addr, data);
break;

- /*
- * continue/restart and stop at next (return from) syscall
- */
- case PTRACE_SYSCALL:
- case PTRACE_CONT:
- ret = -EIO;
- if (!valid_signal(data))
- break;
- if (request == PTRACE_SYSCALL)
- set_tsk_thread_flag(child, TIF_SYSCALL_TRACE);
- else
- clear_tsk_thread_flag(child, TIF_SYSCALL_TRACE);
- child->exit_code = data;
- wake_up_process(child);
- ret = 0;
- break;
-
- /*
- * make the child exit. Best I can do is send it a sigkill.
- * perhaps it should be put in the status that it wants to
- * exit.
- */
- case PTRACE_KILL: {
- ret = 0;
- unregister_all_debug_traps(child);
- invalidate_cache();
- if (child->exit_state == EXIT_ZOMBIE) /* already dead */
- break;
- child->exit_code = SIGKILL;
- wake_up_process(child);
- break;
- }
-
- /*
- * execute single instruction.
- */
- case PTRACE_SINGLESTEP: {
- unsigned long next_pc;
- unsigned long pc, insn;
-
- ret = -EIO;
- if (!valid_signal(data))
- break;
- clear_tsk_thread_flag(child, TIF_SYSCALL_TRACE);
-
- /* Compute next pc. */
- pc = get_stack_long(child, PT_BPC);
-
- if (access_process_vm(child, pc&~3, &insn, sizeof(insn), 0)
- != sizeof(insn))
- break;
-
- compute_next_pc(insn, pc, &next_pc, child);
- if (next_pc & 0x80000000)
- break;
-
- if (embed_debug_trap(child, next_pc))
- break;
-
- invalidate_cache();
- child->exit_code = data;
-
- /* give it a chance to run. */
- wake_up_process(child);
- ret = 0;
- break;
- }
-
case PTRACE_GETREGS:
ret = ptrace_getregs(child, (void __user *)data);
break;
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/