Re: [PATCH] Improve usability in case of init binary failure

From: Andreas Mohr
Date: Tue Feb 02 2010 - 12:48:34 EST


On Tue, Feb 02, 2010 at 09:20:41AM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Mon, 1 Feb 2010 23:10:51 -0800 (PST) David Rientjes <rientjes@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > On Sun, 27 Dec 2009, Andreas Mohr wrote:
> >
> > > Well, took quite a while longer, partly due to broken Broadcom USB host
> > > (OpenWrt fix to be submitted) and non-working USB-audio on nicer platforms.
> > >
> > > Took most of the comments into account (thanks!), improved some wording.
> > >
> > > Patch against current git, compile- and runtime-tested,
> > > checkpatch.pl'd (with a single nice hierarchy warning resulting from mixing
> > > git diff output and manual /dev/null diffing).
> > >
> > > Thanks!
> > >
> >
> > It looks like this patch got mangled when added to mmotm-2010-02-01-16-25
> > in init-mainc-improve-usability-in-case-of-init-binary-failure.patch since
> > it added init.txt to the root directory instead of Documentation,
>
> ah, thanks.
>
> > even though the patch below is correct.
>
> Nope, the patch was wrong:
>
> > > --- a/init/main.c
> > > +++ b/init/main.c
> > ...
> > > --- /dev/null 2009-12-27 16:25:29.521258205 +0100
> > > +++ Documentation/init.txt 2009-12-27 15:47:46.000000000 +0100
>
> Should've been a/Documentation/init.txt

Indeed, which is why I had mentioned it in the submission (above),
but [fatally, as it turned out] did not bother to fix this ""minor"" issue.

Lots of sorries,

Andreas Mohr
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/