Re: [PATCH] netfilter: per netns nf_conntrack_cachep

[Patrick McHardy]

Jon Masters wrote:
> On Tue, 2010-02-02 at 06:35 -0500, Jon Masters wrote:
> 
>> I think there's something more fundamental going on here.
> 
> What happens is the conntrack code attempts to free
> nf_conntrack_untracked back into the SL[U]B cache from which it
> allocates other ct's.

That shouldn't happen, the untracked conntrack is initialized to a
refcount of 1, which is never released.

> There's just one problem...that's a static struct
> not from the cache. So, this is why we end up with the SLAB being
> corrupted and the address immediately following the
> nf_conntrack_untracked being corrupted.
> 
> I shoved some debug comments into the destroy code to see if we were
> trying to free nf_conntrack_untracked, and bingo. I have shoved a panic
> in there now, will send you a backtrace.

Thanks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/