Re: USB mass storage and ARM cache coherency

[Paul Mundt]

On Mon, Feb 01, 2010 at 03:14:04PM -0500, Alan Stern wrote:
> On Mon, 1 Feb 2010, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> 
> > On Fri, 2010-01-29 at 18:54 +0000, Matthew Dharm wrote:
> > > HOWEVER, I firmly believe that the cache-management functions belong with
> > > the driver that actually talks to the low-level hardware, as that's the
> > > only place where you can be 100% certain of what cache operations are
> > > needed.  After all, I think someone is working on a USB-over-IP transport,
> > > and trying to manage cache at the usb-storage level in that scenario is
> > > just silly.
> > > 
> > > So, let's put this in the HCD drivers and be done with it.
> > 
> > The patch below is what fixes the I-D cache incoherency issues on ARM. I
> > don't particularly like the solution but it seems to be the only one
> > available.
> > 
> > IMHO, Linux should have functions similar to the DMA API but for PIO
> > drivers (e.g. pio_map_single/pio_unmap_single) that non-coherent
> > architectures can define, otherwise being no-ops. Any thoughts?
> 
> You should bring this up on the linux-arm-kernel mailing list and CC:  
> the ARM maintainer.  They are the ones most directly affected.
> 
No, this belongs on linux-arch, as it's something that impacts a lot of
people besides ARM.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/